| IR-2007-37, Feb. 20, 2007 WASHINGTON –– The
Internal Revenue Service today identified 12 of the most
blatant scams affecting American taxpayers and warned
people not to fall for schemes peddled by scamsters.
This year the “Dirty Dozen” highlights five new scams
that IRS auditors and criminal investigators have
uncovered. Topping off the list are fraudulent refunds
being claimed in connection with the special Telephone
Excise Tax Refund available to most taxpayers this
filing season. The IRS is actively investigating
instances of this scam involving tax preparers who are
preparing inflated refund requests.
Also new to the Dirty Dozen this year are abuses
pertaining to Roth IRAs, the American Indian Employment
Credit, domestic shell corporations and structured
entities.
“Taxpayers shouldn’t let their guard down,” IRS
Commissioner Mark W. Everson said. “Don’t get taken by
scam artists making outrageous promises. If you use a
tax professional, pick someone who is reputable.
Taxpayers should remember they are ultimately
responsible for what is on their tax return even if some
unscrupulous preparers have steered them in the wrong
direction.”
Involvement in tax schemes leads to problems for scam
artists and taxpayers. Tax return preparers and
promoters risk significant penalties, interest and
possible criminal prosecution.
The IRS urges taxpayers to avoid these common
schemes:
1. Telephone Excise Tax Refund Abuses:
Early filings show some individual taxpayers have
requested large and apparently improper amounts for the
special telephone tax refund. In some cases, taxpayers
appear to be requesting a refund of the entire amount of
their phone bills, rather than just the three-percent
tax on long-distance and bundled service to which they
are entitled. Some tax preparers are helping their
clients file apparently improper requests. The IRS is
investigating potential abuses in this area and will
take prompt action against taxpayers who claim improper
refund amounts and against the return preparers who help
them.
2. Abusive Roth IRAs: Taxpayers
should be wary of advisers who encourage them to shift
under-valued property to Roth Individual Retirement
Arrangements (IRAs). In one variation, a promoter has
the taxpayer move under-valued common stock into a Roth
IRA, circumventing the annual maximum contribution limit
and allowing otherwise taxable income to go untaxed.
3. Phishing is a technique used by
identity thieves to acquire personal financial data in
order to gain access to the financial accounts of
unsuspecting consumers, run up charges on their credit
cards or apply for loans in their names. These
Internet-based criminals pose as representatives of a
financial institution –– or sometimes the IRS itself ––
and send out fictitious e-mail correspondence in an
attempt to trick consumers into disclosing private
information. A typical e-mail notifies a taxpayer of an
outstanding refund and urges the taxpayer to click on a
hyperlink and visit an official-looking Web site. The
Web site then solicits a social security and credit card
number. It is important to note the IRS does not use
e-mail to initiate contact with taxpayers about issues
related to their accounts. If a taxpayer has any doubt
whether a contact from the IRS is authentic, the
taxpayer should call 1-800-829-1040 to confirm it.
4. Disguised Corporate Ownership:
Domestic shell corporations and other entities are being
formed and operated in certain states for the purpose of
disguising the ownership of the business or financial
activity. Once formed, these anonymous entities can be,
and are being, used to facilitate underreporting of
income, non-filing of tax returns, listed transactions,
money laundering, financial crimes and possibly
terrorist financing. The IRS is working with state
authorities to identify these entities and to bring
their owners into compliance.
5. Zero Wages: In this scam, which
first appeared in the Dirty Dozen in 2006, a Form 4852
(Substitute Form W-2) or a “corrected” Form 1099 showing
zero or little income is submitted with a federal tax
return. The taxpayer may include a statement rebutting
wages and taxes reported by the payer to the IRS. An
explanation on the Form 4852 may cite statutory language
behind Internal Revenue Code sections 3401 and 3121 or
may include some reference to the paying company
refusing to issue a corrected Form W-2 for fear of IRS
retaliation.
6. Return Preparer Fraud: Dishonest
return preparers can cause many headaches for taxpayers
who fall victim to their schemes. Such preparers make
their money by skimming a portion of their clients’
refunds and charging inflated fees for return
preparation services. They attract new clients by
promising large refunds. Some preparers promote filing
fraudulent claims for refunds on items such as fuel tax
credits to recover taxes paid in prior years. Taxpayers
should choose carefully when hiring a tax preparer. As
the old saying goes, “If it sounds too good to be true,
it probably is.” Remember that no matter who prepares
the return, the taxpayer is ultimately responsible for
its accuracy. Since 2002, the courts have issued
injunctions ordering dozens of individuals to cease
preparing returns, and the Department of Justice has
filed complaints against dozens of others. During fiscal
year 2006, 109 tax return preparers were convicted of
tax crimes and sentenced to an average of 18 months in
prison.
7. American Indian Employment Credit:
Taxpayers submit returns and claims reducing taxable
income by substantial amounts citing an American Indian
employment or treaty credit. Although there is an Indian
Employment Credit available for businesses that employ
Native Americans or their spouses, there is no provision
for its use by employees. In a somewhat similar scam,
unscrupulous promoters have informed Native Americans
that they are not subject to federal income taxation.
The promoters solicit individual Indians to file Form
W-8 BEN seeking relief from all withholding of federal
taxation. A recent “phishing” variation has promoters
using false IRS letterheads to solicit personal
financial information that they claim the IRS needs in
order to process their "non-tax" status.
8. Trust Misuse: For years
unscrupulous promoters have urged taxpayers to transfer
assets into trusts. They promise reduction of income
subject to tax, deductions for personal expenses and
reduced estate or gift taxes. However, some trusts do
not deliver the promised tax benefits. There are
currently more than 150 active abusive trust
investigations underway and 49 injunctions have been
obtained against promoters since 2001. As with other
arrangements, taxpayers should seek the advice of a
trusted professional before entering into a trust.
9. Structured Entity Credits:
Promoters of this newly identified scheme are setting up
partnerships to own and sell state conservation easement
credits, federal rehabilitation credits and other
credits. The purported credits are the only assets owned
by the partnership and once the credits are fully used,
an investor receives a K-1 indicating the initial
investment is a total loss, which is then deducted on
the investor’s individual tax return. Forming such an
entity is not a viable business purpose. In other words,
the investments are not valid, and the losses are not
deductible.
10. Abuse of Charitable Organizations and
Deductions: The IRS continues to observe the
use of tax-exempt organizations to improperly shield
income or assets from taxation. This can occur when a
taxpayer moves assets or income to a tax-exempt
supporting organization or donor-advised fund but
maintains control over the assets or income.
Contributions of non-cash assets continue to be an area
of abuse, especially with regard to overvaluation of
contributed property. In addition, the IRS is noticing
the return of private tuition payments being disguised
as charitable contributions to religious organizations.
11. Form 843 Tax Abatement: This
scam rests on faulty interpretation of the Internal
Revenue Code. It involves the filer requesting abatement
of previously assessed tax using Form 843. Many using
this scam have not previously filed tax returns and the
tax they are trying to have abated has been assessed by
the IRS through the Substitute for Return Program. The
filer uses the Form 843 to list reasons for the request.
Often, one of the reasons is: "Failed to properly
compute and/or calculate IRC Sec 83-Property Transferred
in Connection with Performance of Service."
12. Frivolous Arguments: Promoters
have been known to make the following outlandish claims:
the Sixteenth Amendment concerning congressional power
to lay and collect income taxes was never ratified;
wages are not income; filing a return and paying taxes
are merely voluntary; and being required to file Form
1040 violates the Fifth Amendment right against
self-incrimination or the Fourth Amendment right to
privacy. Don’t believe these or other similar claims.
These arguments are false and have been thrown out of
court. While taxpayers have the right to contest their
tax liabilities in court, no one has the right to
disobey the law.
IRS Still Watches Scams That Fall Off the
List
Five of last year’s Dirty Dozen tax scams rotated off
the list for 2007. While the IRS has seen a decline in
the occurrence of some of these scams –– abusive credit
counseling agencies, for example –– other problems, such
as offshore abusive transactions continue to be an area
of particular concern for the agency. The absence of a
particular scheme from the Dirty Dozen should not be
taken as an indication that the IRS is unaware of it or
not taking steps to counter it.
How to Report Suspected Tax Fraud Activity
Suspected tax fraud can be reported to the IRS using IRS
Form 3949-A, Information Referral. Form 3949-A is
available for download from the IRS Web site at IRS.gov,
or by mail by calling 1-800-829-3676. The completed form
or a letter detailing the alleged fraudulent activity
should be addressed to the Internal Revenue Service,
Fresno, CA 93888. The mailing should include specific
information about who is being reported, the activity
being reported, how the activity became known, when the
alleged violation took place, the amount of money
involved and any other information that might be helpful
in an investigation. The person filing the report is not
required to self-identify, although it is helpful to do
so. The identity of the person filing the report can be
kept confidential. The person may also be entitled to a
reward. |